Showing posts with label ele. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ele. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Objects in Space

Further to my series on Extinction Level Events—specifically, Comets & The Oort Cloud—I found this amazing video today:



If you want to get the full effect, go here and click on "Watch in HD" in the lower right side beneath the video.

Frankly, I can think of nothing more terrifying than knowing about, and living through, something of this magnitude.

Monday, October 15, 2007

The ELE Series—Global Warming

On October 15th, bloggers around the web will unite to put a single important issue on everyone’s mind—the environment. Every blogger will post about the environment in their own way and relating to their own topic. Our aim is to get everyone talking towards a better future.



Future generations may well have occasion to ask themselves, "What were our parents thinking? Why didn't they wake up when they had a chance?" We have to hear that question from them, now. —Al Gore, An Inconvenient Truth

The latest report on climate change to the United Nations says global warming is happening and that humans are "very likely" responsible for it. CO2 levels, already the highest they've been in over 600,000 years, are still going up, too. Because temperature fluctuations appear to have some correlation with CO2 levels, the earth seems to be much more fragile than we were all taught in grade school and at this rate, if temperatures continue to increase, the Greenland and polar ice caps will almost certainly melt.

In fact, it looks like the ice is already melting at an alarming rate:



Sir Richard Attenborough believes humans are responsible:



And in An Inconvenient Truth, Al Gore presented a graph charting data taken from polar ice samples spanning 600,000 years:


The bottom line on the chart above is the earth's temperature over 600,000 years, and the line above represents CO2 emissions. While there is no scientific proof per se that CO2 emissions are the cause of global temperatures (CO2 emissions might be the effect of a cause which also affects global temperatures), this data is compelling. The vertical red line after the dot is where CO2 emissions are predicted on rising to in the coming years; the line is completely vertical because its rate of increase is so high relative to the chart's timeline that it cannot be seen. Thus, if you accept the assumption that CO2 emissions are the central cause of global warming, you can imagine what impact that level of CO2 emissions would have on global warmth.


2,500 SCIENTISTS
For those who thinks global warming is still fiction, consider this news clipping from January 31, 2007 (and pay special heed to the boldface):
The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is due to release a report in Paris on Friday entitled Climate Change 2007 in which 2,500 scientists from 130 countries unequivocally state that the current trend towards potentially catastrophic global warming has been induced by human activity, which began with the dramatic increase in fossil fuel use during the Industrial Revolution of the mid-19th century....

The report is not without its critics in the scientific community. One senior British climate expert quoted in The Observer warned that the report’s predictions are relatively rosy, given its painstaking consensus process: “The really chilling thing about the IPCC report is that it is the work of several thousand climate experts who have widely differing views about how greenhouse gases will have their effect. Each paragraph of this report was therefore argued over and scrutinized intensely. Only points that were considered indisputable survived this process. This is a very conservative document—that's what makes it so scary.” —Source

Forget for a moment that Al Gore recently won the Nobel Peace Price for his work on raising awareness about climate change. Instead, picture 2,500 scientists across 130 countries co-authoring a document they can all agree on. They may disagree about many things in this document, but "only points that were considered indisputable survived this process." What brand of skeptic can comfortably refute that?


11,000 FOOTBALL FIELDS
Even more evidence for the naysayers—on December 29, 2006, a Canadian ice shelf the size of 11,000 football fields was reported to have broken away from the mainland:
Ancient ice shelf breaks free from Canadian Arctic
POSTED: 11:31 a.m. EST, December 29, 2006

• Scientist: "Disturbing event" shows "we are crossing climate thresholds"
• Researchers using satellite images discovered 2005 event
• Collapse picked up by earthquake monitors 155 miles away

TORONTO, Ontario (AP)—A giant ice shelf the size of 11,000 football fields has snapped free from Canada's Arctic, scientists said.

The mass of ice broke clear 16 months ago from the coast of Ellesmere Island, about 800 kilometers (497 miles) south of the North Pole, but no one was present to see it in Canada's remote north.

Scientists using satellite images later noticed that it became a newly formed ice island in just an hour and left a trail of icy boulders floating in its wake. (Watch the satellite images that clued in ice watchers)

Warwick Vincent of Laval University, who studies Arctic conditions, traveled to the newly formed ice island and could not believe what he saw.

"This is a dramatic and disturbing event. It shows that we are losing remarkable features of the Canadian North that have been in place for many thousands of years. We are crossing climate thresholds, and these may signal the onset of accelerated change ahead," Vincent said Thursday.

In 10 years of working in the region he has never seen such a dramatic loss of sea ice, he said.

The collapse was so powerful that earthquake monitors 250 kilometers (155 miles) away picked up tremors from it.

The Ayles Ice Shelf, roughly 66 square kilometers (41 square miles) in area, was one of six major ice shelves remaining in Canada's Arctic.

Scientists say it is the largest event of its kind in Canada in 30 years and point their fingers at climate change as a major contributing factor.

"It is consistent with climate change," Vincent said, adding that the remaining ice shelves are 90 percent smaller than when they were first discovered in 1906.

"We aren't able to connect all of the dots... but unusually warm temperatures definitely played a major role."

Laurie Weir, who monitors ice conditions for the Canadian Ice Service, was poring over satellite images in 2005 when she noticed that the shelf had split and separated.

Weir notified Luke Copland, head of the new global ice lab at the University of Ottawa, who initiated an effort to find out what happened.

Using U.S. and Canadian satellite images, as well as data from seismic monitors, Copland discovered that the ice shelf collapsed in the early afternoon of August 13, 2005.

"What surprised us was how quickly it happened," Copland said. "It's pretty alarming.

"Even 10 years ago scientists assumed that when global warming changes occur that it would happen gradually so that perhaps we expected these ice shelves just to melt away quite slowly, but the big surprise is that for one they are going, but secondly that when they do go, they just go suddenly, it's all at once, in a span of an hour."

Within days, the floating ice shelf had drifted a few miles (kilometers) offshore. It traveled west for 50 kilometers (31 miles) until it finally froze into the sea ice in the early winter.

The Canadian ice shelves are packed with ancient ice that dates back over 3,000 years. They float on the sea but are connected to land.

Derek Mueller, a polar researcher with Vincent's team, said the ice shelves get weaker and weaker as the temperature rises. He visited Ellesmere's Ward Hunt Ice Shelf in 2002 and noticed it had cracked in half.

"We're losing our ice shelves, and this a feature of the landscape that is in danger of disappearing altogether from Canada," Mueller said. "In the global perspective Antarctica has many ice shelves bigger than this one, but then there is the idea that these are indicators of climate change."

The spring thaw may bring another concern as the warming temperatures could release the ice shelf from its Arctic grip. Prevailing winds could then send the ice island southwards, deep into the Beaufort Sea.

"Over the next few years this ice island could drift into populated shipping routes," Weir said. "There's significant oil and gas development in this region as well, so we'll have to keep monitoring its location over the next few years."


WHAT WILL MELT
Here's what How Stuff Works says about it:
The main ice covered landmass is Antarctica at the South Pole, with about 90 percent of the world's ice (and 70 percent of its fresh water). Antarctica is covered with ice an average of 2,133 meters (7,000 feet) thick. If all of the Antarctic ice melted, sea levels around the world would rise about 61 meters (200 feet). But the average temperature in Antarctica is -37°C, so the ice there is in no danger of melting. In fact in most parts of the continent it never gets above freezing.

There is a significant amount of ice covering Greenland, which would add another 7 meters (20 feet) to the oceans if it melted. Because Greenland is closer to the equator than Antarctica, the temperatures there are higher, so the ice is more likely to melt.

But there might be a less dramatic reason than polar ice melting for the higher ocean level—the higher temperature of the water. Water is most dense at 4 degrees Celsius. Above and below this temperature, the density of water decreases (the same weight of water occupies a bigger space). So as the overall temperature of the water increases it naturally expands a little bit making the oceans rise.

In 1995, the International Panel on Climate Change issued a report which contained various projections of the sea level change by the year 2100. They estimate that the sea will rise 50 centimeters (20 inches) with the lowest estimates at 15 centimeters (6 inches) and the highest at 95 centimeters (37 inches). The rise will come from thermal expansion of the ocean and from melting glaciers and ice sheets. Twenty inches is no small amount—it could have a big effect on coastal cities, especially during storms. — Source.


IF IT ALL MELTS
If global warming accelerates to the worst-case scenario, i.e., if all the world's ice totally melts into the oceans, ocean levels will rise a maximum of 68 meters (220 feet), far less than portrayed in the film Waterworld, but much closer to A.I.. If you assume about 12.5 feet per building story, 220 feet is a little over 17.5 stories, which means my old 17th floor residence in the 20 floor New York City apartment building where I grew up would be completely underwater.


WHAT'S NEXT?
Technically speaking, global warming isn't a definitive extinction level event for humans, but it comes very close. If ocean levels rise too quickly—say over a century, rather then two centuries—mass migrations could spark a crippling economic implosion. Humans adapt, and while they're on the cusp of great technological discoveries, adjusting to an aquatic world by genetically splicing gills into our DNA will likely be overkill: if everything melts, there will still be land to live on. Thus, humans will still be able to to mine the necessary resources to colonize other planets and escape any comets coming from the Oort cloud.

Even so, you have to appreciate the cosmic irony that the accidental warming of our own planet—which could potentially bring about our own destruction here on Earth—may also be the most useful tool we learn to warm up and colonize Mars.

Further reading: An overview of information related to global warming compiled by Texas A&M University's Laboratory for Applied Biotelemetry & Biotechnology.


This is Part 5 of The ELE Series, a list of articles exploring the nature of extinction level events, or E.L.E's. You can read previous articles in the series by clicking on these links:
The ELE Series—An Overview
The ELE Series—Measuring Our Future
The ELE Series—Comets & The Oort Cloud
The ELE Series—Outbreak

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

The ELE Series—Outbreak

In only a year and a half, the Spanish flu of 1918 killed as many as 90 million people around the world... that's more people in 20 months than AIDS has killed in 20 years.

Our modern understanding of hygiene has helped prevent similar catastrophes, but some viral outbreaks cannot be so easily navigated. Today's most dangerous virus is Marburg, originating from the same geographic "hot zone" as AIDS; with only a 0%-3% survival rate (no known patients have been discharged after having contracted Marburg) and no known cure, infectious disease scientists commonly refer to Marburg as a "slate wiper for humans". Most of us walk around ignorant of the dangers of a deadly flu outbreak, but Marburg scares the crap out of infectious disease scientists because their job is to be intimately familiar with this killer germ.

Marburg (pictured at left) is a hemorraghic fever, meaning it's a disease that "bleeds". Blood clots in the bloodstream clog small capillaries, which stop the blood supply to organs (including the brain), skin, intestines... basically, all affected parts of the body die prematurely, waiting only for the rest of the body to catch up. In the later stages of this virus, victims bleed from every orafice: mouth, gums, eyes, nose, ears, anus, vagina, fingertips. The virus attacks each cell of its host in an attempt to convert the host, cell by cell, into itself—this has the nasty effect of liquifying organs and turning the host's body into a walking time bomb of infection. By day three of exposure, one drop of blood may only have 200 viruses in it, but in only five days it will have duplicated its virus load to over five million. (A highly detailed account of Ebola's symptoms can be found here.) Since it is an Afrian tradition to physically care for cadavers after death, Marburg and other hemorhaggic fever cousins like Ebola Zaire and Ebola Sudan frequently decimate villages in that region.

Thankfully, Marburg and Ebola Zaire (pictured at left) can only be transmitted through blood and saliva and the virus is so "hot" that it burns up its victims before it can incubate and spread the virus far enough to do too much damage. Plainly put, as long as you stand back and wait, the poor infected victims will eventually die. The nightmare scenario nobody wants to think about is if Marburg or Ebola Zaire mutate into an airborne virus and does spread far enough that you don't realize how many people are incubating until it's already everywhere.

In 1989, 100 Macaque monkeys were illegally shipped to a warehouse is Virginia. Some of these monkeys were found dying of an unknown strain of hemorragic fever, the virus spreading quickly due to their cramped living conditions. No direct evidence showed humans could catch this particular strain of the hemorragic fever, but nobody dared risk it—all the monkeys were put down, their bodies incinerated. The warehouse was thoroughly disinfected with industrial strength bleach and extremely bright UV light to burn any remaining germs. While technically "clean", the warehouse remains vacant to this day. (You get the sense that authorities would have nuked the place if they could have.)

And then, a shocking discovery—after the warehouse had long been cleaned, it surfaced that a warehouse employee caring for the monkeys had caught a "cold" and vomited blood during a violent coughing fit... but a week later, he had completely recovered. Though highly coincidental, there was no certainty he had contracted the monkeys' virus. The awful truth is that nobody knew about this employee's cold until long after the monkeys had been cremated. Had this employee been incubating a deadly hemorraghic fever the whole time, who knows how far that virus could have travelled before authorities had stopped it? And if it had spread across the world, there wouldn't be enough bleach to disinfect such a wide area. A lot of people in the military and the CDC breathed a huge sigh of relief that day.

Our Next Monster in the Closet: Black Holes

Recommended reading: The Hot Zone: A Terrifying True Story by Richard Preston

Monday, April 23, 2007

The ELE Series—Comets & The Oort Cloud

Perhaps the most well known of all ELE's are massive comets crashing into Earth, like in Armageddon or Deep Impact. The most popular theory explaining dinosaur extinction is a 6 mile long (10 kilometer) comet smashing into the tip of the Yucatan peninsula, 580 miles due south of present-day New Orleans. Its impact was 2 million times larger than the most powerful man-made explosion ever created and left a 112 mile crater (180k).

But where do these big rocks come from? On researching ELE comets, I learned about a spherical group of ice chunks far far outside our solar system called the Oort cloud:


Just as our planet has an orbit around our sun, our entire solar system (including our Oort Cloud) has an orbit within our Milky Way galaxy. More accurately, our solar system has two orbits: every 225 to 250 million years, it rotates around a semi-flat pancake of star systems we call the Milky Way galaxy. Our solar system goes round and round the Milky Way like a slow second hand on a clock, but every 28 to 30 million years it also orbits up and down, i.e., out of and into the thicker part of the Milky Way. In tandem, these two orbits make our solar system resemble a horse on a carousel oscillating up and down and round and round.

During one of these downward orbits into the dense thicket of the Milky Way's stars, our solar system increases its chances of coming close to stars, red dwarfs, black holes or anything else with significant gravitational pull. That could be a severe threat to us because any nearby gravity can distend the Oort Cloud and then—as the approaching star moves off again—its pull diminishes and launches comets out of our solar system's spherical Oort cloud shell towards the strongest source of our solar system's gravity—our sun... and thus to Earth.

Fortunately for us, Jupiter's massive gravity has repeatedly absorbed those comets; in fact, we even saw a set of these comets smash into Jupiter as recently as 1994: the Shoemaker-Levy comets.


And here is an animation of the impacts on Jupiter


Had Jupiter not been good enough to swallow these rocks for us, here's what the impact site might have looked like had any of them hit Earth:


In this image, the impact would have vaporized America's entire Northeastern seaboard and killed countless North Americans for thousands of miles surrounding the impact site. The explosion would have hurdled so much debris into our atmosphere that it would have likely triggered another ice age or or at least destroyed so many crops that it would have sparked worldwide hunger... and panic. And, shockingly, that's the best case scenario.

For a time, scientists thought comet 99942 Apophis would hit earth in 2029, but its trajectory now looks like it will miss Earth by 25,000 kilometers... and then return to hit Earth in 2035. While the chances are slim—1 in 45,000 that this comet will hit Earth sometime in the 21st century—this scenario is still terrifyingly possible. A comet the size of a house can cause a Hiroshima-sized explosion; 99942 Apophis is 320 meters (1/5 mile) wide and would release the equivalent of 880 megatons of TNT, at least 44 times the size of the 1908 Tunguska event that levelled 80 million trees over 2,150 square kilometers (830 square miles).

The good news is that our solar system is on an upward orbit out of the Milky Way's dangerous dense star clusters, meaning our civilization is looking forward to another 30 million years of relative freedom to evolve. The bad news is that this upward orbit is only about 1 million years out of its 30 million year orbit... and it takes about 1 million years for comets from the Oort Cloud to reach Earth.

Making matters worse, there might be many comets out there we don't know about—NASA has actually said it knows how to find these comets, but it just doesn't have enough funding to do the job properly. Ironically, that might be a blessing in disguise—NASA needs about 20 years' lead time to successfully alter a comet's trajectory, so if we all knew a comet were only a year away, we might all be better off not knowing the end is nigh.

Tomorrow's monster in the closet: Outbreak

A hat tip to Chris Walker for pointing me to Lucifer's Hammer by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle, which recounts the global struggles of recovering from a massive comet blast; recommended reading if this is your particular brand of obsession.

Friday, April 20, 2007

The ELE Series—Measuring Our Future

I recently mentioned the Kardashev Scale and how it classifies our civilization as a Type 0.7, where a Type 1.0 civilization can harness the energy of an entire planet. Within my life, we've rocketed from a Type 0.67 to a Type 0.71 civilization and we'll likely exceed a Type 0.74 by the time I'm pushing up the daisies. Some scientists suggest we'll reach a full Type I civilization by 2200, followed by Type II by 5200, and finally a Type III by 7800.

Uh, what?

Okay, here's all that in kidspeak:

Type I = Harnessing a planet's energy = Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars trilogy (where Mars is terraformed)

Type II = Harnessing a solar system's energy = United Federation of Planets in Star Trek

Type III = Harnessing energy from multiple solar systems = The Galactic Republic in Star Wars

Type IV = Mastery of space-time itself = the Time Lords in Doctor Who or the Q Continuum in Star Trek

Most of these projections are (of course!) wildly hypothetical, but there must be some use—or comfort, at a bare minimum—in knowing where our children and grandchildren and great grandchildren are headed... even if it's off course by a few decades.

How does all this relate to extinction level events? Because over the course of Earth's history, several ELE's nearly signaled the complete termination of life on Earth... which would have obviously slammed the brakes on any civilization advancement at all. Most ELE's aren't one trick ponies, either—they're return customers, meaning we've got to cowboy up if we're going to survive—and thrive. So far, thanks to blind luck (or divine protection, if that's your preferred flavor), we keep bouncing back after these catastrophic close calls, even if it does take millions of years. The fact remains, though: any one of those ELE's could change that in a hurry.

So what are these ELE's, exactly?

Tomorrow, you'll meet the first terrifying monster in the closet—The Oort Cloud.

Thursday, April 19, 2007

The ELE Series—An Overview

The research I'm doing for a writing project involves the scope and nature of extinction level events (also called E.L.E.'s). The truth of it is that much of my reading is simply too amazing not to share. The universe is such a crazy and dangerous place which can freak you out if you're the right brand of paranoid. You may get a little stressed out reading some of this stuff, but there is a huge glimmer of hope at the end of the tunnel... if you can stay the path.

There's too much to put it all in one place, so I'm going to break it up into a few easily digestible chunks:


  • MEASURING OUR FUTUREUsing the Kardashev Scale to get a glimpse into our far off future

  • ELE's: OUR MONSTERS IN THE CLOSETAn unflinching catalogue of adult nightmares (in two parts)

  • WITHIN OUR LIFETIMESurprising predictions on our swift evolution


Tomorrow we begin by orienting ourselves in time and space by Measuring Our Future.